Is Rendall & Rittner ignoring fire safety concern of Mallard House residents?

Rendall and Rittner

Is (R&R) Rendall & Rittner ignoring fire safety concern of Mallard House residents?

Mallard House building at Station Court in SW6 London is CLOSED from 3 sides, so Fire Brigade CAN’T reach rear side Flats in case of any fire or rescue.

It DOESN’T have a separate fire escape door instead only one front door for both entry and exit.
That means if there is fire at the staircase or ground floor or lower floor there is no escape for the residents at upper floors.

Is Rendall and Rittner harassing Mallard House residents over disputed service charge? 

However, Mallard House has roof door which can be used as a Fire Escape.

But Rendall and Rittner doesn’t wants to open the roof door & also don’t want to gives keys of roof door to Mallard House residents.

Rendall and Rittner provided 2 statements for not opening the roof doors and both turns out to be false and after that since Oct 2020, Rendall and Rittner team gone silent on why they don’t open roof door or give keys of roof door to the Mallard House residents.

R&R team said for not opening roof door that “the hatch takes you up to the unsafe rooftop area, with no bannisters/boundaries by the edge of the property”.

But RR statement incorrect as there is adequate fencing to the rear and to the front of a wall. Once on the roof, you then have access to the other three residential blocks without the need to climb walls or drop downs, it is completely flat.

Rendall and Rittner reviews 

Mallard House association is looking for a solution but R&R never communicated back on why they provided 2 false statements for not opening roof door and why they don’t open the roof door.

This issue can be easily resolved if they R&R Rendall and Rittner provided roof door keys to the Mallard House residents or open the roof door.

Is R&R Rendall and Rittner has inadequate supervision of St George (Berkeley Group now) properties